Lisle Township Democratic Organization

I hate throwing things away, not so much because I cling to things, but because I cringe at wasting anything. I was compiling a list of local resources for myself when I discovered that SCARCE already has most of what I was looking for. Highly recommended!

Apart from the many things they themselves accept, they have a comprehensive reference page for other resources, including special recycling events and specialty drop-off resources.

The 2022 election cycle was delayed by the state legislature due to Trump delaying the census. The new primary will be on June 28, 2022.  Petitions will be from January 13-March 14 with lower numbers of signatures required than in previous years.

The most immediate consequence is that the “Campaign Bootcamp” previously announced here has been postponed until August 31st. More details will be provided here as soon as the rest of the new schedule is worked out.

It’s really awkward to expect new candidates to start 7 months before petitions but if anyone is interested in getting involved this summer there will be plenty of opportunities. Thanks for your patience!

Our next general Membership Meeting will be held Monday, June 14th at 7:30 PM. The featured topic will be mental health resources in DuPage County.

Registration for Zoom: http://bit.ly/06-14-21-LTDO

We’re also looking for in-person space for our July meeting. Any ideas? Contact news@ltdo.org.

It’s time to celebrate all of those birthdays we’ve missed in quarantine!  LTDO is hosting a birthday bash and we’d like all of you to join us. The party is Sunday, June 27th from 2 pm to 5 pm at Castaldo Park in Woodridge (3024 71st St).

Please sign up now (you can adjust your choices later) for this free event at https://go.LTDO.org/signup-6-27-21. (You might need to click the link again after you sign in.) The form has additional details; please consider volunteering to bring things on the form’s “wish list”.

Due to Covid restrictions, we are limited to 50 people at a time, so you must choose one of the early or late slots on the form. (If restrictions change, we’ll increase the limit.) Masks and 6 foot distancing will be observed.

We’ll provide veggie burgers, kosher hot dogs, buns, chips, and dessert. Hand sanitizer and wipes will also be available. We have a liquor permit, so you may BYOB. You may also want to bring a comfortable lawn chair and a beverage. If you are kind enough to bring additional goodies, they must be individually wrapped.

We look forward to seeing you!

Understanding Federal Government Financing of Long-Term Investments

Among the key policy battles going in Washington is how to pay for repairing and modernizing America’s infrastructure. Democrats are considering higher tax rates for corporations and upper income earners, positions that are popular among people of varied political persuasions. Meanwhile, Republicans regard even the partial restoration of taxes cut during the previous administration as a deal breaker and argue for a much smaller bill than proposed by the President.

Aside from the fact that Republicans in Congress are unlikely to vote for anything that looks like a victory for Joe Biden (though I’d wager that they’d go home to their districts to claim credit for such funding), there’s a more fundamental question here: why is maintenance of the nation’s infrastructure something that requires a so-called “pay-for”?

I’d argue that this is closer to normal wear and tear, just as a home or car tends to become more costly over time, and eventually requires overhaul or replacement. Our country has regularly spent (wasted?) trillions of dollars on weapons, warfare, and tax cuts for the wealthy, with no one on the right questioning how to pay for it. But propose programs to repair and update our infrastructure, and suddenly there are no dollars to be found.

A common argument among Republicans is that the Democrats are expanding the definition to include areas not traditionally considered infrastructure. This can easily be countered by pointing out that the internet, rural electrification and telephony, interstate highways, etc. also didn’t exist less than a century ago, yet are now key components of our infrastructure. Over time, what is considered necessary for a functional economy has evolved and will continue to do so in the future.

One of the fundamental differences between the way our federal government accounting works and the way state and local government units work is that the federal budget accounts for everything on a current basis, where there is no consideration of the value or of an asset or liability over time. Every dollar coming in or going out is counted within the current year’s budget. Under GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles), when a state or local government invests in property, plant, equipment, pension costs, etc., the lifespan of the asset or liability is taken into account. The federal government, however, is constitutionally prohibited from accounting in this manner.

Obviously, the federal government has the power to print money and incur debt in ways not available to local governments, but the requirement to use cash accounting exaggerates the effects of the federal deficit and debt by not, for example, recognizing the value of the government’s physical assets. While I do think that, as a means of moving toward economic equality, it’s beyond time to collect a greater share of taxes from the wealthy and from profitable corporations, infrastructure spending should not depend upon resolving the decades-old problem of our distorted tax system. The stimulative quality of infrastructure investment, coming in the wake of the most recent economic collapse under another Republican president, is reason enough to proceed with an ambitious national renewal program.